Are you eligible for a manufacturing tax credit?

By Elisa Wood

September 10, 2009

The United States has been generous with tax credits for energy production. But until now, it’s been somewhat miserly about giving breaks to those who make the equipment that makes the energy – or saves it.

That’s changed with creation of the Advanced Energy Manufacturing Credit (MTC), part of the federal stimulus package. The 30% tax credit makes $2.3 billion available for new, expanded, or re-equipped domestic manufacturing facilities that produce clean energy equipment.

But with the deadline for applications right around the corner – September 16 – manufacturers are perplexed by eligibility requirements and wondering if they qualify.

Bridget Hust, partner with the law firm Faegre & Benson, who has been pouring over the rules on behalf of clients, says application requirements are “all over the map.” She suggests that if you think you might be eligible, then apply. It may not be clear exactly who will qualify until mid-January when the Internal Revenue Service accepts or rejects applications. And even those that are rejected may have a shot at revising and resubmitting their proposals, she said. The Feds plan to keep giving out money until the $2.3 billion is exhausted.

The credit seems particularly wide open for technologies that reduce carbon dioxide emissions – even the more obscure approaches. Hust says she is particularly eager to see how the tax credit affects manufacturing of advanced transmission, smart grid and energy storage products, since they may be key to integrating more wind power into the system.

The DOE says the credit is available for:

• Technologies that create energy from renewable resources (sun, wind, geothermal and other renewable resources)
• Energy storage technologies (fuel cells, microturbines or other energy storage systems used in electric vehicles)
• Advanced transmission technologies that support renewable generation (including storage)
• Renewable fuel refining or blending technologies
• Energy conservation technologies (advanced lighting, smart grid)
• Plug-in electric vehicles & vehicle components (motors, generators)
• Property to capture and sequester carbon dioxide
• Other property designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

The manufacturer may not need the credit, particularly in a down economy where many lack taxable income. But like the solar and wind production tax credits, it could draw third-party investors in need of a tax break who will partner with the manufacturer.

See Hust’s white paper for more details http://www.faegre.com/showarticle.aspx?Show=10112, or go to http://www.energy.gov/recovery/48C.htm

Visit Elisa Wood at http://www.realenergywriters.com/ and pick up her free Energy Efficiency Markets podcast and newsletter

Efficiency stimulus will lower energy bills, says federal report

By Elisa Wood

April 30, 2009

Depending on your position, the federal stimulus money is either a jobs builder or a national budget buster. The Energy Information Administration offers another take. In a recent analysis, the EIA finds that stimulus money should reduce what consumers and businesses pay to heat, cool and light buildings.

The federal agency this month updated its annual energy outlook to compare how energy costs would fare with and without the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/stimulus/index.html.

The stimulus package delivers about $12.5 billion for energy efficiency improvements in homes and buildings. Those upgrades should cut homeowner bills an average of $64 annually (in real 2007 dollars) over the next two decades. Homeowners will reduce use of heat 1.7%, and air conditioning 3.4% by 2030, the report says. Likewise, commercial buildings should see energy costs drop by an average of $5.7 billion, or 2.7% annually between 2010 and 2030. In all, the report pegs cost cuts for home and building owners in 2020 at $13 billion, or 2.6%, and in 2030 at $21 billion, or 3%.

In addition, expect to see a lot more solar panels and small wind turbines powering stores and offices very soon as a result of significant tax credits and loan guarantees. The stimulus funds should lead to 121 MW more of solar units on commercial buildings by 2011, a 15% jump, and 120 MW in distributed wind turbines by 2016, a 527% jump.

The EIA does not typically update its annual outlook after it is published. But the federal agency decided to do so this year because it was clear that the stimulus money, approved in February, would significantly alter its 2009 outlook, which was released at the end of last year. Indeed, the information may help inform national policy as Congress debates ways to avert higher energy costs under new programs being contemplated, such as carbon cap-and-trade and a renewable energy standard.

Visit Elisa Wood at www.realenergywriters.com and pick up her free Energy Efficiency Markets podcast and newsletter.

Federal energy stimulus: The check is in the mail

By Elisa Wood

March 26, 2009

Energy efficiency companies waiting for federal stimulus money probably feel like they are being told, “The check is in the mail.” It is supposed to arrive, but when?

The federal government will channel a large pot of the money through state agencies, so it is wise to keep an eye on announcements by governors and state energy offices. States must apply by May 12 for $3.1 billion in what is known as the State Energy Plan funds under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The money will go toward rebates to consumers for home energy audits or other energy saving improvements; development of renewable energy projects; promotion of Energy Star products; efficiency upgrades for state and local government buildings; and other efforts initiated by the states.

To secure this money, state governors must write letters to the US Department of Energy explaining spending plans and providing assurance that they will meet federal stipulations. In many cases, the states will pass along money to utilities, which will then hire energy efficiency installers, auditors and others to do the actual work. To see how much money your state will receive and your governor’s letter when it is sent, go to http://www.energy.gov/recovery. Scroll down and click on the map at the bottom of the page.

The DOE recovery site also links to information on funds for weatherization, advanced battery manufacturing, environmental management, research and development, smart grid and other energy programs.

Some states are moving ahead more quickly than others in making public their plans for use of federal money.

In Pennsylvania, Governor Edward Rendell announced this week the names of five companies that will receive $3.8 million for energy conservation improvements. In all, the state expects to receive $366 million through the State Energy Plan program.

The Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources let businesses and public agencies know that funds may be available soon to help them purchase green vehicles. The state expects to receive $5 to $15 million of a $300 million pot for alternative vehicles. To qualify, businesses and public agencies must submit letters of commitment to the state by May 18. The state will apply for the federal money by May 29.

In Connecticut, Governor Jodi Rell sent a letter to DOE explaining the state’s plans to focus on growing its existing fuel cell industry and responding to consumer demand for solar thermal and geothermal products with part of the $38.5 million Connecticut expects through the State Energy Plan program.

Two national efficiency organizations also are working to smooth the flow of stimulus money into the industry. The Alliance to Save Energy has launched an initiative to help publicly-owned utilities expand conservation programs. ASE is undertaking the effort with the American Public Power Association and the Large Public Power Council. Meanwhile, The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy continues to frequently update www.energytaxincentives.org, which has details on recovery act and other incentives available for consumers and businesses.

In addition, K&L Gates is tracking energy stimulus funding and recently reported several grant solicitations, including one to accelerate the market introduction and penetration of advanced electric drive vehicles. Details are available through the DOE’s Vehicle Technologies Program.

So, while the stimulus check for energy efficiency may still be “in the mail,” many hands appear to be ferrying it toward delivery.

Visit Elisa Wood at www.realenergywriters.com and pick up her free Energy Efficiency Markets podcast and newsletter.

$3.1 billion for state energy efficiency programs - Just one catch

By Patrick Costello, guest contributor

March 19, 2009

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act promises to advance the U.S. energy efficiency movement with an unprecedented $26 billion infusion of funds. Of that, $3.1 billion goes to state energy efficiency programs through the Department of Energy’s State Energy Program.

Great news, right? Maybe not, says the Electricity Consumers Resource Council (ELCON) and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC).

To receive the federal stimulus money, states must agree to set up financial incentives that encourage utilities to pursue energy efficiency programs. ELCON and NARUC fear that this promotes a “one-size-fits-all” approach to the administration of energy efficiency programs. In particular, they are concerned that these stimulus funds will sway states to implement revenue decoupling at the expense of developing a more unbiased energy efficiency program plan.

Revenue decoupling is a ratemaking mechanism that breaks the link between a utility’s revenues and energy sales. Since utilities normally profit from selling energy, it’s not in their best interest to push efficiency. Doing so reduces demand for their product. Revenue decoupling counters this problem by allowing utilities to earn a fair rate of return, and sometimes additional financial incentives, on energy efficiency programs. Decoupling has become a common way to align utility financial interests with state efforts to achieve greater energy efficiency.

The debate over revenue decoupling is central to discussion over what makes an energy efficiency program effective. Ratepayers measure success based on how much money they save. And how much money they save may depend on who runs the program.

Utilities, state agencies, third party non-profit organizations, or some combination of the three typically administer efficiency initiatives. Each state shapes its own approach. No one program design seems to be the most effective. Many highly regarded programs differ greatly from one another. But the best programs share one commonality: They are tailored to the unique policies and economic profile of the state and are based on input from a variety of stakeholders.

Critics of the stimulus bill argue that ‘the catch’ – the condition placed upon states before they can receive stimulus money – may stifle such tailoring, hinder development of a state’s full energy efficiency potential, and diminish cost savings. Decoupling creates the foundation for utilities to serve as the primary administrators of efficiency programs. By pushing for revenue decoupling, a state is arguably saying it wants utilities, not a third party non-profit or state agency, to take the lead in developing and administering energy efficiency programs. Therefore, the stimulus bill walks a fine line between encouraging states to implement only utility-administered programs and encouraging them to reform their ratemaking policy so that utilities can, on some level, contribute to the development of a sound energy efficiency program.

Decoupling is somewhat arcane, but ratepayers should be aware of how it may influence their rates as energy efficiency programs evolve.

This is the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s report where the controversial provision can be found on page 26:

http://www.rules.house.gov/111/CommJurRpt/111_hr1_encrpt.pdf

To see a breakdown of the stimulus package’s energy efficiency measures, visit:

http://ase.org/content/article/detail/5388

To learn about and obtain forms for stimulus package energy efficiency tax incentives, visit:

http://www.energytaxincentives.org/

To see how your state’s energy efficiency efforts rank nationally, visit:

http://www.aceee.org/pubs/e086.htm

Visit us at www.realenergywriters.com and pick up our free Energy Efficiency Markets podcast and newsletter.

How US businesses can access federal stimulus money

By Elisa Wood

March 11, 2009

I thought that “federal stimulus” would be high on Google’s hit list. But alas, when I checked its analysis of hot trends yesterday, I discovered that “Rockin’ Robin” is number one.

Thanks to American Idol this 1950s song dominates the search engine. Bringing more music to the ears of business owners, however, is the $20 billion made available for energy efficiency through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. While it is easy to find information about homeowner opportunities (www.energystar.gov), it is difficult to ferret out how Joe-business USA can take advantage of the act’s benefits.

I did, however, find a few valuable sources. Linked-in brought me to a paper by law firm K&L Gates that advises companies with early stage projects on how to apply for money. The paper focuses on renewable energy, but also touches on efficiency, and includes guidance on how to approach government fund managers. Applicants need to make the case that their projects are “game changing” to win priority. They also must be “shovel-ready” – able to begin in 90 days. The paper is available by contacting fred.greguras@klgates.com.

Energytaxincentives.org, a coalition of public interest groups, offers detailed information on existing incentives for commercial buildings, appliance manufacturers and combined heat and power. But the site appears to be still updating to include the ARRA, not surprising considering how many funding details are yet to be worked out, particularly at the state level.

The old standby, Dsireusa.org, is quickly updating information to include ARRA offerings. Those who manufacture certain energy saving and renewable energy products will find details about the 30% tax credit at the site. The program offers $2.3 billion in credits for projects certified by the US Treasury. Preference will go to those projects that are commercially viable, and are best at producing jobs, reducing air pollution, deploying commercial technology and getting off the ground quickly. The Treasury also will look at the applicant’s costs for generating energy, saving energy or reducing greenhouse gases. Additional guidelines will be available in August.

Please post here, or email lisawood@aol.com, with other sites, papers or reports that offer details about how businesses can access incentives through the ARRA 2009.

Visit Elisa Wood at www.realenergywriters.com and pick up her free Energy Efficiency Markets podcast and newsletter.